YCB LogoYCB Youth Civic Bridge
← Back to Projects
PrivacySettledFiled May 2020

ACLU v. Clearview AI

Facial recognition, privacy, and the Fourth Amendment

Plaintiff

ACLU & Illinois residents

Defendant

Clearview AI

What Happened?

Clearview AI scraped over 30 billion photos from social media (Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, etc.) without anyone's consent and built a massive facial recognition database. It sold access to law enforcement agencies across the country. The ACLU sued under Illinois' Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA), arguing this violated people's right to control their own biometric data.

Why Does This Matter?

This case established that companies cannot secretly harvest your face from the internet for profit. The settlement banned Clearview AI from selling its database to most private companies in the US. It's a landmark for biometric privacy and shows how state-level privacy laws can hold even cutting-edge AI companies accountable.

Key Legal Issues

  • 1Can companies scrape your photos from social media to build AI databases?
  • 2Do you have a right to control your own biometric data (face, fingerprints)?
  • 3Should law enforcement be allowed to use AI facial recognition?
  • 4How do state privacy laws like Illinois' BIPA apply to AI companies?

Timeline

Jan 2020

NYT investigation reveals Clearview AI's database

May 2020

ACLU files lawsuit under Illinois BIPA

May 2022

Settlement reached. Clearview banned from selling to most private entities

Sep 2023

Court approves final settlement terms

Student Takeaway

Every selfie you post could end up in an AI database without your knowledge. Clearview AI proved that this isn't hypothetical. It's already happening. This case shows why privacy laws matter and why we need to think carefully about what data AI companies are allowed to collect about us.

Sources